:tocdepth: 2 .. _even_more_on_positive_divisors: Even More on Positive Divisors ============================================================================ .. contents:: :local: .. highlight:: python The outline of the this notebook is as follows: Today we will spend time looking at the functions :math:`\tau` which counts the number of positive the divisors of :math:`n` and :math:`\sigma` which is the sum of positive divisors of :math:`n`.  Our goal is, once again, to use our minds, paper and pencil, and *SageMath* to combine to not just conjecture, but start to give logical reasons for our conjectures. Definition: An arithmetic function is real or complex :math:`f` defined on the set of positive integers. That is :math:`f : \mathbb{Z}_{>0}\to\mathbb{C}`. An arithmetic function :math:`f` is said to be multiplicative if it is not identically zero and if .. math:: f(a\,b) = f(a)\,f(b) \quad \text{ whenever } \gcd(a,\,b) = 1. Let :math:`a` and :math:`b` be positive integers and :math:`f : \mathbb{Z}_{>0}\to\mathbb{C}` is an arithmetic function. If :math:`\gcd(a,\,b)=1` and :math:`f(a\,b) = f(a)\,f(b)` then :math:`f` is said to be an multiplicative. :math:`f` is said to be completely multiplicative if :math:`f(a\,b) = f(a)\,f(b)` for all :math:`a,b \in \mathbb{N}`. Knowing the definition of :math:`\tau` and what it means for an arithmetic function to be multiplicative, can we proof that :math:`\tau` and :math:`\sigma` are both multiplicative function? Let us first consider :math:`\tau`. To prove that :math:`\tau` is a multiplicative function, we must ask ourselves the following questions. .. raw:: html
    .. raw:: html
  1. Is :math:`\tau` an arithmetic function? .. raw:: html
  2. .. raw:: html .. raw:: html
  3. For any two positive integers :math:`a` and :math:`b` with :math:`\gcd(a,b) = 1`, is :math:`\tau(a\,b) = \tau(a)\,\tau(b)`? .. raw:: html .. raw:: html
  4. .. raw:: html
How will you define :math:`\tau` in *SageMath*? .. code:: ipython3 def tau(n): r""" Returns the number of divisors of $n$. """ return number_of_divisors(n) .. code:: ipython3 tau(48)==tau(8)*tau(6) .. parsed-literal:: False Oops! What just happened? I thought we just proved that :math:`\tau` was multiplicative. What went wrong here? Can you think of questions that we could explore on the number of divisors function :math:`\tau`? - If :math:`n` is prime, what is :math:`\tau(n)`? - Is tau(sum of 2 perfect squares) even or odd? - What is :math:`\tau(n)` if n is a perfect square. Is there a pattern? .. raw:: html
Possible questions to guide us to obtain a general formular for the arithmetic function :math:`\tau(n)` for any positive integer :math:`n`. - If :math:`p` is prime, what is the number of divisors of :math:`p`, :math:`\tau(p)`? Is there a general formula? - If :math:`p` and :math:`q` are prime, what is :math:`\tau(p\,q)`? - If :math:`p` is prime, what is the number of divisors of :math:`p^{k}` for :math:`k=2,3,\dots,10`? Is there a general formula for :math:`\tau(p^{k})` for all positive integer :math:`k`? - Given a positive integer :math:`n`, is there a general formula for the number of divisors? Is there a general formula for :math:`\tau(n)`? .. code:: ipython3 tau_of_prime_powers = lambda p, n : table([(p^k, tau(p^k) == k+1) for k in [0..n]], header_row=["$p^k$", r"$[\tau(p^k) = k+1]$"]) .. code:: ipython3 tau_of_prime_powers(3, 10) .. code:: ipython3 prime_range(10) .. code:: ipython3 [tau_of_prime_powers(p,10) for p in prime_range(10)] Conjecture: If :math:`p` is prime then for all :math:`k \in \mathbb{N}`, :math:`\tau(p^{k}) = k+1`. Let us work in groups to proof this now. Proof: .. raw:: html

.. raw:: html

.. raw:: html

.. raw:: html

We have a proof for our conjecture so it is now a theorem. But I will want to call it Lemma 1: If :math:`p` is prime, then for all :math:`k \in \mathbb{N}`, :math:`\tau(p^{k}) = k+1`. .. raw:: html

.. raw:: html

.. raw:: html

.. raw:: html

Now let we want to derive a general formula for :math:`\tau(n)` for all positive integers. We know from the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic that: .. raw:: html

Every positive integer can be written as a finite product of powers of distinct primes. That is, \ :math:`n = \prod_{i=1}^{k} p^{e_{i}}_{i}.` .. raw:: html

Using this result and the multiplicative property of :math:`\tau`, we are able to derive a formula for :math:`\tau` given any positive integer :math:`n`. How would you derive such a formula for :math:`\tau` given a positive integer :math:`n`? Let :math:`n` be any positive integer. We want to derive a formula for :math:`\tau(n)`. By the fundamental theorem of arithmetic .. math:: n = \prod_{i=1}^{k} p^{e_{i}}_{i}. Then .. math:: \tau(n) = \tau\left( \prod_{i=1}^{k} p^{e_{i}}_{i}\right) = \tau(p^{e_{1}}_{1} \, p^{e_{2}}_{2} \cdots p^{e_{k}}_{k}) =\tau(p^{e_{1}}_{1}) \,  \tau(p^{e_{2}}_{2}) \cdots \tau(p^{e_{k}}_{k}) = (e_{1} + 1)\, (e_{2} + 1) \cdots (e_{k} + 1) = \prod_{i=1}^{k}(e_{i} + 1). Hence we have derived the general formula :math:`\tau` given any positive integer :math:`n`. General Formulas ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here is the general hint to follow in order to get a general formula for these arithmetic functions. .. raw:: html Observe that these are the steps we followed to obtain a general formula for the number of divisors function :math:`\tau`. In mathematics, a perfect square say :math:`x` is the product of some integer say :math:`y` with itself. That is, :math:`x = y^{2}`. - Investigate on the number of divisors of perfect squares using *SageMath*. - Observe your data very closely and try and come up with a conjecture on a pattern you think will always be true. - Proof your conjecture. You are encouraged to work in groups. Right now, try working on your own or in groups to try to prove the following conjectures. - For a perfect square :math:`n^{2}, \tau(n^2)` is odd. (For a full proof, you will probably need a reason why only certain numbers can divide other numbers.) Now use the procedure we followed to derive a formula for :math:`\tau` to derive a formula for :math:`\sigma` for any positive integer :math:`n`. Let us recal the definition of :math:`\sigma`. It is defined as follows: Given a positive :math:`n`, :math:`\sigma(n)` is the sum of all the positive divisors of :math:`n`. - Check if :math:`\sigma` is *multiplicative*, that is, .. math:: \sigma(a\,b) = \sigma(a)\,\sigma(b)\qquad \text{whenever } \gcd(a,\,b)=1. \ If it is multiplicative, then try to prove it. How will you define :math:`\sigma` in *SageMath*? .. code:: ipython3 def sigma(n): """ Returns the sum of the divisors of `n` """ pass Can you formulate questions about the sum of positive divisors of :math:`n`, :math:`\sigma(n)`, that we could explore? - Write your questions here. It turns out that sometimes it is also useful to have functions adding up just certain divisors.  For instance, one could write a function :math:`\tau_o(n)` for just the odd divisors, and :math:`\tau_e(n)` for just the even divisors.  Or you could define :math:`\tau_1(n)` and :math:`\tau_3(n)` to be the functions giving the number of divisors which are congruent to :math:`1` (mod :math:`4`) and :math:`3` (mod :math:`4`), respectively. Try doing a few of these as well.  You will likely want to recall how to use filtered list comprehensions, or “if/else” statements in a loop. Naturally, I strongly encourage you to make interactive cells if this proves useful to you! Exploring Divisors ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Anyway, you should spend quite a bit of time today to try to find more patterns - or prove them! The kinds of questions here are somewhat different from those with partitions. Modulo/Congruerence ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ It turns out that there are some pleasant patterns for when :math:`\tau` and :math:`\sigma` are even and odd. I encourage you to explore and give arguments for what you find. Try to prove the conjectures that you come up with. - One could also investigate whether there are patterns when n is even or odd.  What happens to :math:`\tau(n)+\sigma(n)`? - Write a program to demonstrate that :math:`\sigma(n)=2\,n` if and only if the sums of the reciprocals of its (positive) divisors equals :math:`2`. Give an algebraic reason why this works. - Investigate the values for :math:`\tau(n)` or :math:`\sigma(n)` modulo other primes :math:`p`.  It would be interesting to see if there are any useful conjectures here.